Web 2.0 in the classroom

I’ve taken the plunge and have decided to focus my doctoral study on the barriers to using Web 2.0 tools in the classroom.  Because it’s a relatively new field, I’ll need help from you out there.  Please send me the names of any articles, journals, books, etc. that you think will help me in my research.

In a few days I’ll post more about what I’m thinking and where I want to head. 

 But for now, I have a paper due Sunday, people, and I need 3 references!

We are riders

I was reading Robert Frost last night (my favorite poet) and came across this poem.  I thought it was a great metaphor for what we are trying to do.

Riders

The surest thing there is is we are riders,

And though none too successful at it, guiders,

Through everything presented, land and tide

And now the very air, of what we ride.

 

What is this talked-of mystery of birth

But being mounted bareback on the earth?

We can just see the infant up astride,

His small fist buried in the bushy hide.

 

There is our wildest mount- a headless horse.

But though it runs unbridled off its course,

And all our blandishments would seem defied,

We have ideas yet that we haven’t tried.

 

Rule #1: Share with Others

Interesting comment by Gary Stager on The Pulse: “Every kid with a laptop is now a broadcaster capable of sharing experiences, work, thoughts, concerns and comments with the world. Every faculty meeting may be archived. More importantly, conversations may emerge and engage “participants” where they are at the moment or when time allows.

Many of your schools invested large sums of money for videoconferencing equipment capable of watching a lecture from another location. Like in a traditional classroom, students in videoconferencing settings are expected to sit down and shut up (SDSU). After all, it’s rude to talk when someone else is speaking – even if such conversations help you understand what is being presented. Chatting allows the social construction of knowledge while others are speaking without those conversations being disruptive.”

Stager writes about how, while he was in the middle of a conversation, people around the world were chatting about the conversation.  Imagine having professional development with a real-time discussion board.  It would sure be telling.  Are the participants getting it or are they just complaining about how bored they are? 

Let’s add Twitter to the mix (which I haven’t used yet, but know about).  What if during an assignment students could Twitter a question?  Using a discussion board or wiki allows for teachers to think about grouping in a whole new way.  Student groups no longer have to be made up of the kids in your class during a period.  You could group across periods, across schools, across the world! (insert swelling orchestra music). 

Now let’s talk teacher groups.  Some teachers have done it by creating blogs and sharing.  What if a district could form teacher groups from around THE WORLD (cue music)?  

In today’s society, these types of ideas are perfect reasoning why every student should have a laptop and why districts should stop purchasing desktops for teachers and replace them with laptops.  We need to be able to get and share information at any time, any place.  Not just get, but SHARE.  After all, sharing is caring.